A small note on variation in segmentation annotations

We report on the results of a small crowdsourcing experiment conducted at a workshop on machine learning for segmentation held at the Danish Bio Imaging network meeting 2020. During the workshop we asked participants to manually segment mitochondria in three 2D patches. The aim of the experiment was to illustrate that manual annotations should not be seen as the ground truth, but as a reference standard that is subject to substantial variation. In this note we show how the large variation we observed in the segmentations can be reduced by removing the annotators with worst pair-wise agreement. Having removed the annotators with worst performance, we illustrate that the remaining variance is semantically meaningful and can be exploited to obtain segmentations of cell boundary and cell interior

A cross-center smoothness prior for variational Bayesian brain tissue segmentation

\u3cp\u3eSuppose one is faced with the challenge of tissue segmentation in MR images, without annotators at their center to provide labeled training data. One option is to go to another medical center for a trained classifier. Sadly, tissue classifiers do not generalize well across centers due to voxel intensity shifts caused by center-specific acquisition protocols. However, certain aspects of segmentations, such as spatial smoothness, remain relatively consistent and can be learned separately. Here we present a smoothness prior that is fit to segmentations produced at another medical center. This informative prior is presented to an unsupervised Bayesian model. The model clusters the voxel intensities, such that it produces segmentations that are similarly smooth to those of the other medical center. In addition, the unsupervised Bayesian model is extended to a semi-supervised variant, which needs no visual interpretation of clusters into tissues.\u3c/p\u3